Proving yet again that she’s not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) thought it’d be fun to attack Vice President Kamala Harris and suggest that she’s uneducated and unable to handle the duties of her job.
All Boebert accomplished, however, was drawing attention to her own lack of intelligence as her accusation doubled back and hit her right in the face.
The Colorado Republican tweeted:
“Kamala Harris knows so little about everything that it’s almost impressive.”
Kamala Harris knows so little about everything that it’s almost impressive.
No matter your opinion of Harris, her academic credentials are impeccable. She graduated from Howard University and earned her law degree from the Hastings College of Law at the University of California.
Boebert, on the other hand, is a high school dropout and needed three tries before she could earn a passing score on the GED, which she obtained just a few months before she took office.
That was all it took to elicit a thorough online mocking of Boebert for daring to question anyone’s knowledge or education.
Problem with this tweet is that the tweeter actually believes the tweet is true.
If you look up the word irony in the dictionary, this tweet will serve as its definition. But then you also have to know what dictionary & definition mean.
Not the woman who dropped out of high school & received a GED speaking on the VP that graduated HS & two universities- emphasis on VP. Shall I continue?
Kari Lake is running to be the GOP gubernatorial nominee in the state of Arizona, and she’s doing so with the full blessing and endorsement of failed, one-term former President Donald Trump.
But when a reporter from “60 Minutes Australia” asked Lake about “your man, Donald,” the candidate took offense and stormed off the set, proving that the biggest snowflakes in the world are indeed right-wingers when you dare to confront them with facts.
Reporter Liam Bartlett began by asking what Lake thought about Trump’s suggestion that he would pardon anyone convicted for their role in the January 6 Capitol insurrection if he runs for president and manages to win in 2024, to which Lake responded:
“Well, that really has nothing to do with being Governor of Arizona. I wasn’t there.”
Bartlett countered:
“Let’s be fair on this. Your man, Donald — your man, Donald, brought it up.”
Lake, however, said she was offended by what Bartlett had said:
“Why did you say that, sir? Your man, Donald?”
Bartlett:
“He said they should all be pardoned. Do you think they should be pardoned.”
But Lake remained focused on the “your man, Donald” comment:
“I’m still amazed you said that. Your man, Donald. That’s just so disrespectful.”
“Why would it? He’s endorsed you. His personal endorsement.”
Lake whined:
“It’s just the flippant attitude. It’s just — it’s obvious you’ve come into this. It’s obvious you’ve come into this and you don’t like President Donald Trump.”
Bartlett continued to press, again asking:
“Kari, do you think they should be pardoned?
The Arizona Republican remained combative:
“I have no say in that. I’m running for governor. This isn’t something a governor does. You’re trying to twist that to make me look bad.”
Bartlett:
“You’re a Republican. He’s the Republican leader.”
A few seconds, later, Lake walked off the set in a huff, acting like a child throwing a temper tantrum.
Trump-endorsed AZ Gov candidate Kari Lake sat down for interview with ‘60 Minutes Australia,’ which aired tonight. Things when downhill fast when she was asked if she agreed with Trump that J6 defendants should get pardoned. She ends up storming off the set. pic.twitter.com/Jmat6BTS1l
For some reason known only to him, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) thought it would be a good day to kiss failed, one-term former President Donald Trump’s fat ass, but his efforts only succeeded in getting him mocked and ridiculed on Twitter.
Oddly, the tweet Jordan sent out was just the ex-president’s last name:
What in the hell is that all about? Is it just an attempt to provoke people? Is it some sort of code that only the MAGA morons understand? Or could it be that Jim has simply run out of material for his social media account?
Fortunately, others on Twitter were more than equal to the challenge, and they lit up Jordan in some incredibly original and hilarious ways. Take a look:
Oh, so we are playing Jeopardy. I need to answer in the form of a question.
"Which U.S. President had discussions with Jim Jordan just prior to his supporters attacking the U.S. Capitol in an attempted coup?"
During an appearance on Fox News Tuesday, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) tried not once, but TWICE to insult President Joe Biden, only to flub both attempts and wind up looking like the clueless dullard she is and always will be.
HuffPost notes that Boebert’s attempts at slagging Biden were on the issues of taxes and energy independence:
“I don’t know who’s running the federal government these days: Joe Biden or Prince John from … uhhhh … Prince John,” Boebert said on Fox News Tuesday. “But they’re taxing us into poverty.”
Boebert: I don’t know who is running the federal government these days, Joe Biden or Prince John uhh from uhhh uhh Prince John pic.twitter.com/MJ1ujbLoYk
Boebert was probably trying to reference Prince John from the Disney animated movie “Robin Hood,” but apparently the already minimal synapses in her brain refused to fire.
A few minutes later, the Colorado Republican used a double negative that completely undercut what she was trying to communicate:
“If it’s not American energy, Joe doesn’t want it.”
It didn’t take long before “Prince John” began to trend on Twitter, and the videos of Bobert’s Fox appearance have been viewed over 1.2 million times so far.
Here’s some of what Twitter users had to say about Boebert’s televised faceplant:
Lauren Boebert said "I don't know who is running the federal government these days, Joe Biden or Prince John."
A lot of people are mocking her since there is no Prince John, but I believe that Lauren Boebert is being honest that she does not know who runs the federal government.
During a Tuesday debate on the “Don’t Say Gay” legislation that has already passed the Florida House of Representatives and is now before the Senate, Republican State Sen. Ileana Garcia rose to speak in favor of the bill, but what she said proved that her opinion of the issue is far from fully informed.
Speaking for over 15 minutes, Garcia expressed her support for the legislation, which would ban teachers from discussing sexual orientation and gender identity with younger students:
“Gay is not a permanent thing, LGBT is not a permanent thing. This isn’t about targeting. This is perhaps about rerouting the responsibilities back to the parents.”
Garcia also claimed that she has family and friends who are LGBT, “but I don’t pander on that.”
And then there was what the senator had to say about a transgender woman she claims who know who prefers to date women:
“A friend of mine went through the whole transition as an older man, 58-years-old, became a woman and guess what? He still likes women! He went through the whole process and we’d laugh together and I’d say, why do you want to deal with the hormones? Why do you want to worry about the extensions and the hair and boobs and the nails and he loved it.
“So he had a sexual experience. And he realized that he continued to like women.”
And while she was at it, Garcia also decided to share some completely bogus “statistics” about gender-affirming surgery:
“You know, a lot of people don’t know that I think that the statistics are that 4 out of 7 people who do the full transition end up committing suicide because it’s tough.”
Nope. Not even remotely accurate. As a matter of fact, gender-affirming surgery is actually shown to reduce the likelihood of a person committing suicide.
The bill was passed by the Florida Senate and now heads to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) who will sign it because he wants to try and create a cultural issue he can use to get a second term in office and use his reelection as a springboard to the 2024 GOP presidential nomination.
